If the main site is down, check here first.

Knowing too much - and how to handle it safely

Punting forums exist to share information punters can’t easily get anywhere else.
Over time, informed punters - whether reviewers or readers - build review knowledge that changes how they approach bookings.
They learn who offers what, what extras are real, and how sessions really play out - not just what the ads say.

But WLs expect punters to discover services organically - through conversation, trust-building, and sometimes over several sessions rather than immediately.
When you already know too much, you break that natural process.

WLs can pick up when someone knows more than they should - even if you never openly admit it.
Handled badly, you risk exposure, blacklisting, and loss of trust - personally, socially, and inside the forums that depend on discipline.
Protecting yourself means controlling what you know - not just what you say.


Why revealing review knowledge is problematic

Even casual comments or behaviors can expose you as someone who knows more than you should.
Once a WL realizes this, you stop being a client and start being a source of anxiety and blame.

You become:

  • A punter who can no longer be trusted
  • A target for blame about reviews - across all sites, not just one
  • A way for her to access gossip she normally avoids

Instead of a relaxed session, you find yourself:

  • Justifying things you didn’t say
  • Defending reviewers you’ve never met
  • Losing control of the booking

How one slip turns into permanent exposure

Once you reveal or hint at review knowledge, some WLs won't let it go.

They keep coming back for more:

  • "Any new posts about me?"
  • "What did they say last week?"
  • "Was that review about me?"

You lose:

  • Her personal trust
  • The trust of her friends and colleagues if she talks about you
  • The trust of fellow forum members if you review or share
  • The trust of punters who gifted you information in good faith

WLs can also:

  • Place you on their personal blacklist
  • Place the reviewer they suspect on a wider blacklist shared among workers

Even if you refuse to show her reviews, you can still be wedged by questions like:

  • "At least tell me — what do they say about my appearance?"

Any answer creates risk.
Staying polite but evasive becomes essential.


How WLs pump punters for information

WLs see hundreds of punters over time.
They become expert at pumping information without appearing obvious.
They know how to:

  • Play on male instincts to protect
  • Tap into weaker punters' need to feel important
  • Trigger confessions disguised as casual conversation

Once weak punters start leaking, they often can't stop.
They confuse being manipulated with being trusted.
They leak again and again — and the damage compounds.

The moment you feel flattered, trusted, or special — you are at risk.
Strong punters stay polite, aware, and guarded.


How to handle conversations safely

Stay polite, neutral, and personal when interacting:

  • "You seemed like my type."
  • "Your ad stood out to me."
  • "You looked relaxed and confident."
  • "I had a good feeling and decided to take the chance."

Short answers.
Warm delivery.
No signs you know more than an average punter.


Even your behavior can give you away

WLs notice more than most punters realize.

If you:

  • Drive two hours for a short booking
  • Know her shift times without being told
  • Respond vaguely when asked "what do you want?" - but still steer toward unlisted extras
  • Show clear awareness of premium services that aren't advertised

It raises suspicion.
When you bypass the organic discovery process, it signals review knowledge - even without words.

Sessions can shift:
More guarded, more transactional, less genuine.

Sometimes even polite honesty can trigger suspicion.
Managing what you know protects you.


WLs are also affected:

  • Some withdraw services completely after losing control over client expectations.
  • Some blacklist punters they suspect are leaking or reviewing, or blacklist reviewers if they can identify or guess them.
  • Some experience mental health strain from seeing raw descriptions of private activities.

WLs who get information from punters often:

  • Confront reviewers directly
  • Distort or misinterpret what was said
  • Out the punter accidentally or deliberately

You might think you won't get caught.
But once a WL feels exposed - whether by what you leaked or simply by a review existing - she doesn't care what damage she causes.
It’s your reputation, your network, and your booking future that burn - not hers.


At TNT, members are required to protect reviewer anonymity and forum discussions.
TNT exists to let punters speak freely - but that freedom depends on trust.
When you protect the boundary, you defend not just yourself, but the flow of real-world information that benefits everyone.

Breaking that trust damages more than your own reputation.
It damages the entire community.

Other forums may not enforce consequences the way TNT does, but the outcomes are the same:

  • Trust collapses
  • Good information dries up
  • Everyone loses

A final word

Knowing too much isn’t the problem.
Failing to manage it is.

  • Stay polite but firm.
  • Protect the boundary.
  • Protect yourself, the punters who helped you, and the punters who come after you.

Noticeboard for thenakedtruth.reviews